ZADNE Porusenie GPL - ??

[Karel Zak]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:08:44AM +0200, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> >  Docela by mne zajimalo jak je to s binarnimi non-GPL moduly do
> >  GPL programu.
> Zavisi od autorov.
> 
> >  Typicky napriklad nektere ovladace do kernelu. 
> Linus s tym suhlasi.
>
> >  Z toho textu to na mne dela dojem, ze napsat takovy modul do 
> >  nejakeho programu je temer nemozne (tedy pokud tam neni nejaky 
> >  licencni dodatek od vlastnika copyrightu).
> Zhruba tak.

 A kde je ten dodatek licence v pripade kernelu. Jedine co tam vidim
 je nasledujici, a v tom nejak moc nenachazim jak by se mel ten modul 
 licencne chovat.

NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use kernel
services by normal system calls - this is merely considered normal use
of the kernel, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived
work".  Also note that the GPL below is copyrighted by the Free
Software Foundation, but the instance of code that it refers to (the
Linux kernel) is copyrighted by me and others who actually wrote it.  

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <zakkr na zf.jcu.cz>
 http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
 
 C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz