[Fedora TeX Live] Retiring detex from the fedora repositories

Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 06:06:26 CEST 2012


On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 23:26 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi Ankur,

Hello Jindrich,

> 
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:54:00PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > Since detex is already provided by the texlive repos, should I
> retire
> > the package[1] from Fedora? 
> 
> It depends also on your decision. If you think it is better to have
> only one (texlive) version of detex then I don't object. 

I think this would be better since I expect the detex that is released
with the texlive distribution to stay more up to date, and more in sync.
I see no point in us having two binaries. It would only confuse users
IMO.

I'll get the package retirement process started. 

Thanks for your work Jindrich! :)
-- 
Thanks, 
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"

Please only print if necessary. 

Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/attachments/20120702/71434a34/attachment.sig>


More information about the TeXLive mailing list