[Fedora TeX Live] Retiring detex from the fedora repositories
Ankur Sinha
sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 06:06:26 CEST 2012
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 23:26 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
Hello Jindrich,
>
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:54:00PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Since detex is already provided by the texlive repos, should I
> retire
> > the package[1] from Fedora?
>
> It depends also on your decision. If you think it is better to have
> only one (texlive) version of detex then I don't object.
I think this would be better since I expect the detex that is released
with the texlive distribution to stay more up to date, and more in sync.
I see no point in us having two binaries. It would only confuse users
IMO.
I'll get the package retirement process started.
Thanks for your work Jindrich! :)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/attachments/20120702/71434a34/attachment.sig>
More information about the TeXLive
mailing list