[Fedora TeX Live] Version mismatch in kpathsea packages

Matthew Saltzman mjs at clemson.edu
Sun Jun 3 01:53:52 CEST 2012


This issue also prevents rebuilding of evince, needed because of
evince-dvi dependency:

        $ sudo yum install evince-dvi
        Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
        Resolving Dependencies
        --> Running transaction check
        ---> Package evince-dvi.x86_64 0:3.4.0-2.fc17 will be installed
        --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for
        package: evince-dvi-3.4.0-2.fc17.x86_64
        Package kpathsea-2007-70.fc17.x86_64 is obsoleted by
        1:texlive-kpathsea-svn26056-1.noarch which is already installed
        --> Finished Dependency Resolution
        Error: Package: evince-dvi-3.4.0-2.fc17.x86_64 (fedora)
                   Requires: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit)
                   Available: kpathsea-2007-70.fc17.x86_64 (fedora)
                       libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit)
         You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
        

On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 12:08 -0400, texlive.5.smy at neverbox.com wrote:
> I was attempting to rebuild PyX from the fedora 16 source rpm and 
> discovered an apparent version mismatch between texlive-kpathsea-lib and 
> texlive-kpathsea-lib-devel.
> 
> $ sudo yum install texlive-kpathsea-lib-devel
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package texlive-kpathsea-lib-devel.x86_64
> 1:2012-0.1.20120510_r26283.fc16 will be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2012 for package:
> 1:texlive-kpathsea-lib-devel-2012-0.1.20120510_r26283.fc16.x86_64
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package:
> 1:texlive-kpathsea-lib-devel-2012-0.1.20120510_r26283.fc16.x86_64
> (texlive)
>             Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2012
>             Installed:
> 1:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-0.1.20120510_r26283.fc16.x86_64 (@texlive)
>                 texlive-kpathsea-lib = 1:2012-0.1.20120510_r26283.fc16
>   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>   You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> 
> I forced the install and got the package built, but I felt I should at 
> least make somebody aware.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TeXLive mailing list
> TeXLive at linux.cz
> http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive

-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


More information about the TeXLive mailing list