[Fedora TeX Live] Packaging: TeX tree for non-texlive packages

[Jindrich Novy]

Hi Bob,

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 09:03:52AM -0500, Bob Tennent wrote:
>  >|> This question should be asked at Fedora, not at Fedora-TeXLive. My
>  >|> answer would be to create /usr/share/texmf and add that tree to the
>  >|> TeXLive configuration.
>  >|
>  >|I think that this list is the right place in the sense that the
>  >|discussion here could lead to new guidelines in Fedora. Every major
>  >|language in Fedora has a set of mailing lists where the issues are
>  >|discussed before being written in the guidelines. IMHO this list fills
>  >|the same role for tex related discussion.
> 
> What are the current Fedora guidelines for TeX-related packages? The
> last time I looked, packages were supposed to be named tex-..., rather
> than tetex-... or texlive-...; that seems to have changed.

as far as I know nothing changed. The TeX related package should still
preferably have the tex- prefix.

Jindrich

> 
> Bob T.
> _______________________________________________
> TeXLive mailing list
> TeXLive at linux.cz
> http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy at redhat.com>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
Non Red Hat email: novyjindrich at gmail.com