ntfs patch

[Jan Kasprzak]

Petr Sturc pise:
: Dostal jsem takovouhle odpoved:
: 
: Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
: The text leading up to this was:
: --------------------------
: |diff --new-file -ur linux-2.0.30-orig/fs/Config.in linux/fs/Config.in
: |--- linux-2.0.30-orig/fs/Config.in     Sun Dec  1 08:58:05 1996
: |+++ linux/fs/Config.in Mon Sep 29 08:23:13 1997
: 
: Bezim na RH5.0 Kernel 2.032
: 
: Copak mi ten patch vlastne chce?

	Nic. To jen oznamuje, ze rozpoznal ve standardnim vstupu zacatek
a typ patche. Dulezite je, co bylo za tim. Pokud tam byly jen radky typu
"Hunk #<cislo> succeeded", je to OK. Pokud cely vypis konci slovy
"<cislo> out of <cislo> hunks failed", nepodarilo se nektere casti
opatchovat.

	Man patch.

-Yenya

--
\ Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at fi.muni.cz>       http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/
\\ PGP: finger kas at aisa.fi.muni.cz   0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E //
\\\             Czech Linux Homepage:  http://www.linux.cz/              ///
/// The people who deserve to be flamed are digital who on the altavista \\\
//news page claim the entire project ran on 200 Alphas running NT, welcome\\
/ to the world of lies, half truths and microsoft.              --Alan Cox \