Future: Linux will replace Microsoft Windows getting 98% desktop market!

rkell557 rkell557 na ceinetworks.com
Pátek Květen 3 23:14:25 CEST 2002


Choong,

I'm the director of IS for a medium sized corporation.  We have been
converting our legacy systems from proprietary platforms to anything that is
open.  What I have learned is Microsoft is one of the poorest operating
systems for mission critical applications that I have ever encountered in my
20 years of working with computers.  If the IBM's and the UNISYS's of the
world had released an O/S like windows (not even worth capitalizing the
word), they'd be out of business.  We are constantly doing reboots on our
servers just because we know windows is going to die.  I used to be a
pro-Microsoft person, but now there isn't a day that goes by where I'd like
to go find Bill Gates and beat the crap out of him.  I've even gone as far
as writing to my politicians about Microsoft's MONOPOLY.

We have ported several of our mission critical applications to Linux and
find that it is a very stable operating system.  Heck, we've even found some
free applications on sourceforge.net that do a better job than our old MS
based applications.  Although, I find that Linux is a little difficult to
configure and find drivers for, it is as stable as the old proprietary O/S's
that we used to have on mainframes.  Some of our Linux boxes have been
running for months without a reboot.  Something that microsoft will never be
able to do.


"Choong Kedat Yian" <sunrock na tm.net.my> wrote in message
news:3CA6ECBC.B222DBF1 na tm.net.my...
> I started with Mandrake 7 and its only problem is how to configure Netconf
in order
> to get the Kppp working . After the 4 attempt , i am already succesfull
browing the
> web with MDK7.0 , but now since 8.1 is so easy to install and there is no
need to
> configure the PPP dialer , i would say that Mandrake is better than
Windows .The
> only thing here is that more manufacturer should join in for more hardware
drivers
> althought Mandrake itself is EXCELLENT with many default drivers database
.
>
> I am now ready to buy the 3 CDs of MDK8.2
> Choong
>
> "Anthony W. Youngman" wrote:
>
> > >"Ken Morris" <kenmo na hfx.andara.com> wrote in message
> > >news:fp6j6ucft153fohgadvb9gpukdrk1kgh4n na 4ax.com...
> > >> I wouldn't bet the farm on it. Although Linux may surpass some
> > >> versions of Windows, especially Windows 9x, in stability I doubt it
> > >> will ever get as easy to install and configure as Windows. I'm hoping
> > >> it does 'cause I want someone to give Microsoft a run for their
money.
> > >> And I'm hoping it's Linux now that BeOS is dead.
> > >>
> > Linux will never be as easy to install as Windows? I've got news for
> > you!
> >
> > In my experience linux has LONG been EASIER to install than windows.
> > Installing doze has been an absolute nightmare on far too many
> > occasions. Take my current attempts with Win2K. I'm trying to install
> > that on the same disk (different drive letter) to Win98. It stomps all
> > over the 98 partition, reboots, and blue-screens. Installing 98 on that
> > machine was a real pain too - it kept on blue-screening, but when I gave
> > up and came back the next day it was fine...
> >
> > On the other hand, linux has been a cinch almost since I first started
> > trying to install it with a distro called Universe. Even Slack on
> > floppies was dead easy, just thoroughly boring as I swapped floppy after
> > floppy (30 in total! :-(
> >
> > How people can claim doze is easier to install I don't know (unless by
> > install they mean "switch on and let the auto-install just run).
> > --
> > Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk
> > Witches are curious by definition and inquisitive by nature. She moved
in. "Let
> > me through. I'm a nosey person.", she said, employing both elbows.
> > Maskerade : (c) 1995 Terry Pratchett
>





Další informace o konferenci Linux