Samba a slozitejsi prava

[David Lukaštík]

On St, 2003-05-07 at 12:32, Honza Houstek wrote:
> > > Tady bych si dovolil nesouhlasit. NT acl se trochu lisi od POSIX acl a s
> > > tim mapovanim byly/jsou problemy. V sambe 2.2.8a je napr. narozdil od
> > > 2.2.7 nahrazen cely ACL kod verzi z samby 3.0 a chovani je trochu jine.
> 
> > Hmm, tak proto to blbne s WinNT. :o((( A pak padaji DOSove aplikace a
> > tak dale. :o((( Blbe to zobrazuje a interpretuje na Win dodatecna prava
> > a podobne. Neni na to nejaky work-around, aby to chodilo, tak jak ma?
> 
> Tohle (mozna) je jedna moznost
> 
> acl compatibility (G)
>               New in Samba 2.2.8 and above, this string parameter
>               tells  smbd  if it should modify any Windows access
>               control lists created  from  POSIX  access  control
>               lists to remove features which are supported by
>               Windows 2000 but not supported by  the  Windows  NT
>               ACL edit.
> 
>               By  default  this parameter is set automatically by
>               detecting the client type and is set to  "true"  if
>               the client is Windows NT.
> 

Hmm, su uplne slepy.

V tom ChangeLogu jsem to prehledl.

Dik za nakopnuti. :o))

Jeste jeden dotaz. Chodi to bez problemu s acl 1.1.3 nebo musi byt
upgrade na vyssi verze?