[Fedora TeX Live] texlive + evince-dvi

[Zdeněk Janeček]

Hi,
I had same problem. Now, I use xdvik instead. I appreciate a solution to
this problem of dependencies too.

Trutwin, Joshua píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 20:01 +0000:
> Building a 32-bit Fedora 13 image to match our current 64-bit setup at the request of some of our users, so I'm doing a full texlive install from scratch.  I used the 2010 stable repo and installed with: 
> 
> rpm -ivh http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f13/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc13.noarch.rpm
> yum install texlive-scheme-full
> 
> One of the packages installed on the 64-bit system is evince-dvi, so I tried to install that as well:
> 
> yum install evince-dvi
> 
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package evince-dvi.i686 0:2.30.3-2.fc13 set to be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4 for package: evince-dvi-2.30.3-2.fc13.i686
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: evince-dvi-2.30.3-2.fc13.i686 (updates)
>            Requires: libkpathsea.so.4
>            Available: kpathsea-2007-49.fc13.i686 (fedora)
>                libkpathsea.so.4
>            Available: kpathsea-2007-51.fc13.i686 (updates)
>                libkpathsea.so.4
>  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> 
> I've had problems with these two packages (evince-dvi and kpathsea) in the past but I'm wondering what the best way to deal with this one is?  I notice that there is a texlive-kpathsea package.
> 
> # rpm -qa | grep kpathsea
> texlive-kpathsea-lib-2010-1.20100720.fc13.i686
> texlive-kpathsea-doc-2010-1.svn19287.fc14.noarch
> texlive-kpathsea-2010-1.svn19287.fc14.noarch
> texlive-kpathsea-bin-2010-1.20100720.svn18765.fc13.i686
> 
> Should I just force install evince-dvi assuming that this meets its dependency?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> TeXLive mailing list
> TeXLive at linux.cz
> http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive