[Fedora TeX Live] texlive + evince-dvi

[Trutwin, Joshua]

Building a 32-bit Fedora 13 image to match our current 64-bit setup at the request of some of our users, so I'm doing a full texlive install from scratch.  I used the 2010 stable repo and installed with: 

rpm -ivh http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f13/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc13.noarch.rpm
yum install texlive-scheme-full

One of the packages installed on the 64-bit system is evince-dvi, so I tried to install that as well:

yum install evince-dvi

--> Running transaction check
---> Package evince-dvi.i686 0:2.30.3-2.fc13 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4 for package: evince-dvi-2.30.3-2.fc13.i686
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: evince-dvi-2.30.3-2.fc13.i686 (updates)
           Requires: libkpathsea.so.4
           Available: kpathsea-2007-49.fc13.i686 (fedora)
               libkpathsea.so.4
           Available: kpathsea-2007-51.fc13.i686 (updates)
               libkpathsea.so.4
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

I've had problems with these two packages (evince-dvi and kpathsea) in the past but I'm wondering what the best way to deal with this one is?  I notice that there is a texlive-kpathsea package.

# rpm -qa | grep kpathsea
texlive-kpathsea-lib-2010-1.20100720.fc13.i686
texlive-kpathsea-doc-2010-1.svn19287.fc14.noarch
texlive-kpathsea-2010-1.svn19287.fc14.noarch
texlive-kpathsea-bin-2010-1.20100720.svn18765.fc13.i686

Should I just force install evince-dvi assuming that this meets its dependency?

Thanks!

Josh