Porusenie GPL - dilema

[Jirka 'Eagle' Novak]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement)
... This means neither you nor the other party can openly discuss
aspects of either business that would be considered proprietary
information, such as financial statements, plans to launch new products,
or any things that would harm either company should the information be
made public.

Hmmm, mam dojem, ze kdyby si s tim nekdo dal praci, tak na zaklade vyse
uvedeneho dotazu by zrejme dokazal zjistit, o kterou firmu by se
hypoteticky jednalo. Ten dotaz by pak mohl byt povazovan za poruseni
podminek (to by asi zaviselo na tom, kdo ma lepsi pravniky).

Jinak v CR se musi policie zabyvat i anonymnim oznamenim trestneho cinu,
pokud vim. Coz sice cloveka ochrani pred postihum ze strany zminene
firmy, ale moralne se s tim musi vyrovnat sam.

- --
Jirka 'Eagle' Novak
registered linux user #173581

E-Mail:   eagle na unicode.cz
ICQ:      46044619
HomePage: http://seal.unicode.cz/~eagle/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj2KzQgACgkQ3C/LHJbMZlIDowCbBmVn6ck+TecLtoPTwPEAqA9r
M10An08iA2n4wnzZ+vCkkoTfIiqHdq6Y
=4E7r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----